Agent prominence and movement in Russian third person plural impersonals (“indefinite-personal sentences”)

Autor/innen

Schlagworte:

agentivity, linguistic prominence, verbs of motion, volition, sentience

Abstract

The present paper reports the results of an acceptability judgement test designed to test two hypotheses: first, that the Russian 3pl impersonal construction is affected by agent prominence, i.e. verbs implying a more prominent agent are more acceptable than verbs implying an agent with fewer agentivity features; second, that movement as an agentivity feature should be conceptualized as a gradual category, thus making a fast-moving referent a more prominent agent than one moving slowly. The former hypothesis could be verified, the latter falsified.

Literaturhinweise

Berger, Tilman. 1991. Zum denotativen Status „unbestimmt-persönlicher“ Konstruktionen im Tschechischen. In Grochowski, Maciej & Weiss, Daniel (eds.). “Words are physicians for an ailing mind”: Ὀργῆς νοσούσης εἰσὶν ἰατροὶ λόγοι, 71–81. München.

Bizzarri, Camilla. 2015. Russian as a partial pro-drop language: Data and analysis from a new study. Annali di Ca’ Foscari: Serie occidentale 49. 335–362.

Bulygina, Tatʹjana V. & Šmelev, Aleksej D. 1997. Jazykovaja konceptualizacija mira (na materiale russkoj grammatiki). Moskva.

Bunčić, Daniel. 2008. Die (Re )Nationalisierung der serbokroatischen Standards. In Kempgen, Sebastian & Gutschmidt, Karl & Jekutsch, Ulrike & Udolph, Ludger (eds.), Deutsche Beiträge zum 14. Internationalen Slavistenkongress, Ohrid 2008, 89–102. München.

Bunčić, Daniel. 2018. Impersonal constructions in Slavic languages and the agentivity of the verb. In Kempgen, Sebastian & Wingender, Monika & Franz, Norbert (eds.), Deutsche Beiträge zum 16. Internationalen Slavistenkongress, Belgrad 2018, 101–110. Wiesbaden.

Bunčić, Daniel. 2019. Agent prominence in the Polish -no/-to construction. In Bauer, Anastasia & Bunčić, Daniel (eds.), Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik: XXIV. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in Köln, 17.–19. September 2015, 63–76. Frankfurt am Main.

Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia. 2006. ‘Arbitrary’ pro and the theory of pro-drop. In Ackema, Peter & Brandt, Patrick & Schoorlemmer, Maaike & Weerman, Fred, Arguments and agreement, 230–258. Oxford.

Crocker, Matthew W. & Brants, Thorsten. 2000. Wide-coverage probabilistic sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(6). 647–669.

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619.

Gast, Volker & van der Auwera, Johan. 2013. Towards a distributional typology of human impersonal pronouns, based on data from European languages. In Bakker, Dik et al. (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 119–158. Berlin.

Himmelmann, Nikolaus & Primus, Beatrice. 2015. Prominence beyond prosody – a first approximation. In De Domenicis, Amadeo (ed.), pS-prominenceS: Prominences in Linguistics, Proceedings of the international conference, Viterbo, Italy, 12–14 December 2013, 38–58. Viterbo.

hrWaC = Croatian Web Corpus v2.2 (2014). In No Sketch Engine. https://www.clarin.si/noske/all.cgi/first_form?corpname=hrwac.

Kibort, Anna. 2004. Passive and passive-like constructions in English and Polish. Cambridge. (PhD dissertation.)

Kretzschmar, Franziska & Graf, Tim & Philipp, Markus & Primus, Beatrice. 2019. An experimental investigation of agent prototypicality and agent prominence in German. In Gattnar, Anja & Hörnig, Robin & Störzer, Melanie & Featherston, Sam (eds.), Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2018: Experimental data drives linguistic theory. http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation 32628.

Kudrnáčová, Naděžda. 2008. Directed motion at the syntax-semantics interface. Brno.

Lindseth, Martina. 1998. Null-subject properties of Slavic languages: With special reference to Russian, Czech and Sorbian. München.

MacDonald, Maryellen Coles & Pearlmutter, Neal J. & Seidenberg, Mark S. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101. 676–703.

Malamud, Sophia A. 2013. (In)definiteness-driven typology of arbitrary items. Lingua 126. 1–31.

Malchukov, Andrej & Ogawa, Akio. 2011. Towards a typology of impersonal constructions: A semantic map approach. In Malchukov, Andrej & Siewierska, Anna (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 19–56. Amsterdam.

McShane, Marjorie. 2009. Subject ellipsis in Russian and Polish. Studia Linguistica 63(1). 98–132.

Melʹčuk, Igorʹ A. 1995. Russkij jazyk v modeli «Smysl ⇔ tekst» / The Russian language in the Meaning—Text perspective. Moskva.

Nikitina, Elena N. 2011. Neopredelënno-ličnye predloženija. In Plungjan, Vladimir A. (ed.), Russkaja korpusnaja grammatika. http://rusgram.ru/Неопределенно-личные_предложения.

NKRJa = Nacionalʹnyj korpus russkogo jazyka. http://ruscorpora.ru/.

Padučeva, Elena V. 2012. Neopredelenno-ličnoe predloženie i ego podrazumevaemyj subʺekt. Voprosy jazykoznanija 2012(1). 27–41.

Philipp, Markus & Graf, Tim & Kretzschmar, Franziska & Primus, Beatrice. 2017. Beyond verb meaning: Experimental evidence for incremental processing of semantic roles and event structure. Frontiers in Psychology 8:1806. 1–16.

Plungjan, Vladimir A. 2011. Vvedenie v grammatičeskuju semantiku: Grammatičeskie značenija i grammatičeskie sistemy jazykov mira. Moskva.

Prenner, Maria Katarzyna. 2019. Agentivität in menschlich-unpersönlichen Konstruktionen im Polnischen. Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław 15. 341–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.23817/lingtreff.15 29.

Primus, Beatrice. 2011. Animacy and telicity: Semantic constraints on impersonal passives. Lingua 121(1). 80–99.

Siewierska, Anna. 2008. Introduction: Impersonalization from a subject-centred vs. agent-centred perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 106 (2). 115–137.

Siewierska, Anna & Papastathi, Maria. 2011. Towards a typology of third person plural impersonals. Linguistics 49(3). 575–610.

Švedova, Natalija Ju. (ed.). 1980. Russkaja grammatika. 2 vols. Moskva.

Tilburg, José van. 1986. South Slavic accusative objects accompanying ‘reflexive’ se. Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku 29(1). 91–101.

Vinogradov, Viktor V. 1954. Grammatika russkogo jazyka. Tom 2, častʹ 2. Moskva.

Veröffentlicht

05.08.2020

Zitationsvorschlag

Bunčić, Daniel. 2020. Agent prominence and movement in Russian third person plural impersonals (“indefinite-personal sentences”). Die Welt der Slaven: Internationale Halbjahresschrift für Slavistik. Wiesbaden 65(2). 297–311.

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Artikel

Kategorien